https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg02177.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
Created attachment 36558
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36558&action=edit
fix implementation (binutils)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
Created attachment 36557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36557&action=edit
fix implementation (gcc)
I've implemented the fix you described in the binutils thread, and it does in
fact
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
arm-none-eabi GCC only supports little-endian, not big-endian and
armeb-none-eabi GCC only supports big-endian, not little-endian.
To make them support both, you need to pass the right -m option
to linker.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
I've filed the corresponding binutils report here:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
Jonathan Roelofs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
s/ginutils/binutils/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2)
> Do you have big endian multilibs suitably built ?
Yes, both the big-endian and little-endian multilibs seem to work, and have
reasonable results in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target|
10 matches
Mail list logo
