https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
--- Comment #7 from Brian Groose ---
It turns out I was using binutils' nm when building gcc. I rebuilt gcc making
sure that only the AIX nm was available, and ld can now find the symbols.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
Brian Groose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brian at groose dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
Torbjörn Gard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tgard at opentext dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Is this a regression?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
This is a regression, but only indirectly a GCC regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
CC|
