https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 66137 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:43:49 2015
New Revision: 231529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231529=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:42:05 2015
New Revision: 231528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231528=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6)
> > Yeah. Or if neither -m{,no-}accumulate-outgoing-args is specified, perhaps
> > turn that on automatically instead if -ffixed-ebp and only error out if
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can I leave this PR to you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > As main needs dynamic stack realignment, I wonder if we just shouldn't error
> > out on trying to compile it with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > > As main needs dynamic stack realignment, I wonder if we just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> As main needs dynamic stack realignment, I wonder if we just shouldn't error
> out on trying to compile it with -ffixed-ebp.
It is still possible to compile with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|uros at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #11 from henric at bergenwall dot com ---
I have noted that the compilation works with any 2 out of the 3 gcc-flags!
> gcc -finstrument-functions -ffixed-ebp a.c -> successfully compiles!
> gcc -m32 -ffixed-ebp a.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6)
> > > Yeah. Or if neither -m{,no-}accumulate-outgoing-args is specified,
> > > perhaps
> > > turn that on automatically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to henric from comment #11)
> I have noted that the compilation works with any 2 out of the 3 gcc-flags!
>
> > gcc -finstrument-functions -ffixed-ebp a.c -> successfully compiles!
> > gcc -m32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Dec 8 18:41:21 2015
New Revision: 231419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231419=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/68701
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
17 matches
Mail list logo
