https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Starke ---
(In reply to katayama.hirofumi...@gmail.com from comment #4)
> Hello, Andrew Pinski.
> Where is ld bug track?
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19480
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 70207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284
--- Comment #4 from katayama.hirofumi.mz at gmail dot com ---
Hello, Andrew Pinski.
Where is ld bug track?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||katayama.hirofumi.mz@gmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Starke ---
I have tried a couple of things to find the cause of this bug.
- using -O1 instead of -O3 when building GCC
- using -O2 instead of -O3 when building GCC
- using -fno-lto when building GCC
- using the
