https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
Ruslan Nikolaev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> The question is if e.g. XMM aligned loads are atomic or not. If they are,
> we'd have to use some pattern that would ensure RA etc. doesn't optimize
> that into a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
