[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2022-02-24 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2017-07-03 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #10 from

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2017-07-03 Thread night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2017-07-03 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2016-12-05 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Sorry, but guessing around has proben to be extremely unefficient and error prone, in particular if the information is available on the other end of the wire. If -mrelax leads to wrong code, then you

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2016-12-05 Thread night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 --- Comment #6 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru --- I reported not one case but suboptimal behavior while optimizing size - GCC optimization of sibling calls increases size of binary. There are a lot of such places in this code. And GCC never

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2016-12-01 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Whould you please mention to what module you are referring? Spi.ii?

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2016-05-24 Thread night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 --- Comment #4 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru --- Created attachment 38551 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38551=edit testcase in attachment without -no-optimize-sibling-call reported bug can be found in

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2016-05-23 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- You can follow the bug reporting instructions an provide the preprocessed code and the compiler output as described in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need Just add -v -save-temps to the compiler's command

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2016-05-23 Thread night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 --- Comment #2 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru --- *** testcase for call+ret: (all code from https://github.com/night-ghost/minimosd-extra/tree/master/MinimOsd_Extra), compile with -fno-optimize-sibling-calls #include class SPI { public:

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

2016-05-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization