https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-30 17:00:45 UTC ---
On 1/29/2012 5:39 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Perhaps this should be closed as WONTFIX?
This enhancement should be done. It appears both the
32 and 64-bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-10 19:49 ---
Boooiinngg...
Or, is anyone working on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-04-10
20:17 ---
Subject: Re: gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0
Boooiinngg...
Or, is anyone working on this?
I'm not. Note that the HP code is using 64-bit registers and instructions
in 32-bit
