https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #13 from Hongtao.liu ---
;; Function fn (fn, funcdef_no=5484, decl_uid=32317, cgraph_uid=5485,
symbol_order=5484)
int fn (const int * px, const int * py, const int * pz, const int * pw, const
int * pa, const int * pb, const int *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #11)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> > > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> > > > Do we have IR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> > > Do we have IR for unsigned/signed saturation in gimple level?
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> > Do we have IR for unsigned/signed saturation in gimple level?
>
> Not yet. I was just looking for that today due
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> Do we have IR for unsigned/signed saturation in gimple level?
Not yet. I was just looking for that today due because of PR 51492.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > clang can now produce:
> > mov eax, dword ptr [esp + 16]
> > mov ecx, dword ptr [esp + 28]
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> clang can now produce:
> mov eax, dword ptr [esp + 16]
> mov ecx, dword ptr [esp + 28]
> vmovdqu xmm0, xmmword ptr [ecx + 32]
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #6 from Petr ---
Yes, the code is not really doing anything useful, I only wrote it to
demonstrate the spills problem. Clang actually outsmarted me by removing half
of the code :)
I think this issue can be closed, I cannot repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #5 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #2 from Petr ---
With '-mtune=intel' the push/pop sequence is gone, but YMM register management
remains the same - 24 memory accesses more than clang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
11 matches
Mail list logo
