subject:"\[Bug target\/77483\] \[6\/7 regression\] gcc.target\/i386\/mask\-unpack.c etc. FAIL"

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

2016-12-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

2016-11-03 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Thu Nov 3 17:06:49 2016 New Revision: 241825 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241825&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Work around 32-bit i386 STV testcases failing with -mstackrealign (PR target/77

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

2016-10-24 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Mon Oct 24 08:07:27 2016 New Revision: 241464 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241464&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Work around 32-bit i386 STV testcases failing with -mstackrealign (PR target/77

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

2016-09-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

2016-09-07 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- > You could add dg-skip-if or XFAILs to the tests now failing. IMHO a testsuite > issue. I though about just adding -mno-stackrealign to the af

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

2016-09-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- You could add dg-skip-if or XFAILs to the tests now failing. IMHO a testsuite issue.