https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
--- Comment #6 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Feb 7 12:51:00 2017
New Revision: 245247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245247=gcc=rev
Log:
[ARM][PR target/78945] Fix libatomic on armv7-m
libatomic/
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
--- Comment #5 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Feb 7 12:47:51 2017
New Revision: 245246
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245246=gcc=rev
Log:
[ARM][PR target/78945] Fix libatomic on armv7-m
libatomic/
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Mon Jan 30 11:34:13 2017
New Revision: 245023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245023=gcc=rev
Log:
[ARM][PR target/78945] Fix libatomic on armv7-m
ARM libatomic inline asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2)
> A simple patch would be to check for __ARM_FEATURE_SAT in all those macros
> in exch_n.c along with HAVE_STREXB etc ..
__ARM_FEATURE_SIMD32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*
--- Comment #1 from nsz
