https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Wed Mar 1 21:18:18 2017
New Revision: 245819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245819=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79544
* rs6000/rs6000-c.c (struct altivec_builtin_types):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Wed Mar 1 21:17:46 2017
New Revision: 245818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245818=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79544
* rs6000/rs6000-c.c (struct altivec_builtin_types):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Mon Feb 27 16:06:13 2017
New Revision: 245762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245762=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79544
* config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
Note that this is indeed wrong because the semantics of vec_sra are to
duplicate the sign bit even for unsigned inputs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Version|unknown
