https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #20 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Wed Sep 4 13:06:55 2019
New Revision: 275374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275374=gcc=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix PR81800
PR81800 is about the lrint inline giving spurious FE_INEXACT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #19 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Wed Sep 4 12:42:22 2019
New Revision: 275373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275373=gcc=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix PR81800
PR81800 is about the lrint inline giving spurious FE_INEXACT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[8/9/10 regression] on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #16 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> > > Patches should be pinged after a week if they aren't reviewed,
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> > Patches should be pinged after a week if they aren't reviewed, furthermore,
> > it is better to CC explicitly relevant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #14 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> Patches should be pinged after a week if they aren't reviewed, furthermore,
> it is better to CC explicitly relevant maintainers.
I've got about 10 patches waiting,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |8.4
