[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-11-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-11-20 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Yes, it fixed on Haswell, we're even slightly faster than before the problematic revision. Tomorrow I'll measure Zen as well.

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-11-19 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|2017-10-19

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-10-19 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The rev. was supposed to be a no-op? I also guess so.

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener