[Bug target/82989] [6/7/8 regression] Inexplicable use of NEON for 64-bit math

2018-03-21 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989 --- Comment #22 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sudi Date: Wed Mar 21 17:14:48 2018 New Revision: 258723 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258723=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] Fix test pr82989.c for big endian and mthumb The test pr82989.c

[Bug target/82989] [6/7/8 regression] Inexplicable use of NEON for 64-bit math

2018-03-20 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989 --- Comment #21 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sudi Date: Tue Mar 20 10:54:42 2018 New Revision: 258677 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258677=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][PR82989] Fix unexpected use of NEON instructions for shifts This

[Bug target/82989] [6/7/8 regression] Inexplicable use of NEON for 64-bit math

2018-03-14 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989 --- Comment #20 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Proposed patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg00644.html

[Bug target/82989] [6/7/8 regression] Inexplicable use of NEON for 64-bit math

2018-02-19 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989 --- Comment #19 from Wilco --- (In reply to sudi from comment #17) > Since this looks like a pretty invasive problem, according to my discussions > with Wilco and Kyrill, I think I will try to propose a smaller, but > temporary fix using the ?s