[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-06-22 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Santos --- Thank you Rainer!

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-06-22 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-06-22 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Fri Jun 22 06:22:14 2018 New Revision: 261881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261881=gcc=rev Log: Don't preprocess .S files with -P on Solaris/x86 (PR target/85994) PR

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-06-22 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Fri Jun 22 06:19:14 2018 New Revision: 261880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261880=gcc=rev Log: Don't preprocess .S files with -P on Solaris/x86 (PR target/85994) PR

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-06-21 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-06-04 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- >> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) >>> I see several

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-06-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||subscribe at teskor dot de --- Comment

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-05-30 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) >> I see several possible fixes: >> >> * Just compile those files with -g0: there's probably no

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-05-30 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov --- > Why does this affect only new files, i.e. how did existing libgcc .S files > avoid running into the same issue? Besides the

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-05-30 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-05-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) > I see several possible fixes: > > * Just compile those files with -g0: there's probably no point in gas adding > debug info anyway. > > * Restrict the cpp -P

[Bug target/85994] Comparison failure in 64-bit libgcc *_{sav,res}ms64*.o on Solaris/x86

2018-05-30 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.2