https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 6 12:20:09 2018
New Revision: 266852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/87598
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, and the powerpc part is ancient (and no one reported it), so I'm not
planning to backport it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|9.0 |
Summary|[8 Regression] Reje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Oct 22 14:03:22 2018
New Revision: 265392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265392&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Handle print_operand_address for unexpected RTL (PR87598)
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
No problem, and thanks for finding and reporting the bug :-) This bug is over
25 years old...
I'm committing a fix for the rs6000 part.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
>
> --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> GCC 7 fails for me like the rest, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
>
> --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> rs6000.c print_operand_address does no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
GCC 7 fails for me like the rest, and according to history it should have
failed since day 1, over 28 years ago. Is that "works with 7.3.1" for
aarch64 only?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
rs6000.c print_operand_address does not like (const_int 0) or any other
const_int. Power *can* actually have constant numbers as data addresses,
but only for instructions that have some D form; and GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64, powerpc64le|aarch64, powerpc*-*-*
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64, powerpc64le
Known to work
13 matches
Mail list logo
