[Bug target/88346] [9 Regression] Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88346] [9 Regression] Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-23 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sun Dec 23 13:28:20 2018 New Revision: 267375 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267375=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] PR88346, Inconsistent list of CPUs supported after r266502 This patch

[Bug target/88346] [9 Regression] Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/88346] [9 Regression] Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/88346] [9 Regression] Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- OK, good, the %e is doing its job in showing up missing cases.. And thanks for pointing out the silly typo.

[Bug target/88346] [9 Regression] Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|