[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9/10 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

2019-11-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.5 |8.4 --- Comment #12 from Richard

[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9/10 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

2019-09-18 Thread 0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 --- Comment #11 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10) > > /usr/bin/time ./a0-7.4 |& egrep -o [0-9]+.*user > 1.48 real 1.26 user > /usr/bin/time ./ag-7.4

[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9/10 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

2019-09-17 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) from comment #9) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > Please provide a compilable testcase. > > Done some time ago. Please change the status of

[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9/10 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

2019-06-14 Thread 0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 --- Comment #9 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Please provide a compilable testcase. Done some time ago. Please change the status of this bug from