https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
--- Comment #6 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Mon Apr 22 16:09:13 2019
New Revision: 270493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270493=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-04-22 Kelvin Nilsen
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
--- Comment #5 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Apr 17 15:40:12 2019
New Revision: 270413
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270413=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-04-17 Kelvin Nilsen
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
--- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Tue Mar 19 13:44:03 2019
New Revision: 269796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269796=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-03-19 Kelvin Nilsen
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I found this on a Power7 (maybe -m32, not sure).
Your patch is eerily like what I did to fix this in testing, but the comment
right below says it does not use -mvsx on purpose?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
--- Comment #1 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Segher,
I agree with your analysis. I'm not sure we have easy access to a platform
where I can demonstrate/reproduce the problem. Do you know where I can test
this?
I believe the proper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Priority|P3
