[Bug target/89965] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

2019-04-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/89965] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

2019-04-04 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > > I see the problem also with GCC 8.2.1. Are you sure Jan that it's a 9 > > regression? > > Sorry, I meant Zdenek :)

[Bug target/89965] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

2019-04-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > I see the problem also with GCC 8.2.1. Are you sure Jan that it's a 9 > regression? Sorry, I meant Zdenek :)

[Bug target/89965] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

2019-04-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/89965] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

2019-04-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1