https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've committed a patch solving PR91333. The patch also solves the current PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=2a07345c4f8dabc286fc470e76c53473e5bc3eb7
So I guess we can close the current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Sounds good Vlad. Real curious to see what, if any, heuristics work in
practice. We can obviously reevaluate this BZ once you've wrapped up on 91333.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Created attachment 47744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47744=edit
gzipped testcase that should work with gcc-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Egorushkin ---
It reproduces with boost-1.64, https://godbolt.org/z/89HiMR
I don't have boost-1.64 currently available to generate a reprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
