https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2a4bf2d6edde8b148421668a4c07c844b994271
commit r10-6530-gc2a4bf2d6edde8b148421668a4c07c844b994271
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #10 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> I think the following patch is the correct fix:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
> index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think the following patch is the correct fix:
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
index ad4676bc167..787323255cb 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Kamlesh Kumar from comment #6)
> This Fixes it.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> index 2e73f3515bb..155f4c45500 100644
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
Kamlesh Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #5 from Guillaume ---
I think I found a work-around for the time being.
If you define your packed structs with the 'volatile' qualifier, the bug
doesn't seem to show up. May not be completely ideal, but it appears to work,
and the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #4 from Guillaume ---
Thanks :)
Le sam. 28 sept. 2019 à 02:13, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> a écrit :
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
>
> Andrew Pinski changed:
>
>What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #2 from Guillaume ---
Thanks for your quick reply.
Yes, I actually managed to write a minimal test case showing the problem
(attached source file).
Compiling it with:
aarch64-elf-gcc -mcpu=cortex-a72 -march=armv8-a+crc -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Do you have a full testcase?
13 matches
Mail list logo