https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:17:50AM +, gilles.filippini at free dot fr
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
>
> --- Comment #5 from Gilles Filippini ---
> Created attachment 47175
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
--- Comment #5 from Gilles Filippini ---
Created attachment 47175
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47175=edit
Tentative self-contained test case for PR92361
Here is a tentative self-contained test case, made after the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fortran has no concept of a varargs call. It is an error to call a procedure
with
a different number or type of arguments (unless there is an explicit interface
and the dummy arguments are optional or ...).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
Gilles Filippini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gilles.filippini at free dot fr
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92361
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
