https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93172
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why should it be limited that way? simplify_rtx does not / should not care
about peculiarities of a certain architecture or microarchitecture.
A transform like this would be a good idea I think, and wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93172
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This isn't a regression, so I don't think we can handle it for GCC 10.
Anyway, with the simpler ~k instead of _knot_mask16(k) we don't optimize that
in combine either:
(set (reg:V16SF 88)
(vec_merge:V16S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93172
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|