https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coleb at eyesopen dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93270
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I can live with that :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93270
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93270
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The question that pops up is more general. If you consider a store with
a mode that has GET_MODE_BITSIZE > GET_MODE_PRECISION, what happens to the
off-precision bits? So I would guess the DSE issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93270
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
And pasting from my ml analysis:
So clearly something is wrong:
unit-size
align:128 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 2
canonical-type 0x7682d3f0 precision:80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
