https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94649
--- Comment #7 from Henning Baldersheim ---
Thanks, perhaps add 104688 to the see also list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94649
--- Comment #5 from Henning Baldersheim ---
Are there any next steps here.
This is still an issue at least with gcc-12. It would be nice to get rid of the
hacks we have to avoid it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94649
Niall Douglas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94649
Yongwei Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wuyongwei at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94649
--- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity ---
Maybe we can have a new flag -mcx16all that assumes that all code using 16-byte
CAS is compiled with the flag.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94649
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
--- Comment #1 from Richard
