[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-15 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-15

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- I think that splitter should disappear and rs6000_emit_set_long_const handle all special cases where you might want combinations of two logical instructions before handling the li;rldicl, li;rldicr or any other

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #7) > and of course, li 0x is li -1 which sets all bits. Erm, yes. Duh. So that g:5d3ae76af13 splitter should not fire for numbers that fit in 32 bits but

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- and of course, li 0x is li -1 which sets all bits.

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- That's easy. rs6000_emit_set_long_const doesn't generate that sequence. Incidentally, a patch I had to generate more constants from li;rldicl also fixes this pr.

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- So hrm, why did GCC generate lis 0x ; ori 0x ; rldicl instead of li 0x ; oris 0x ?

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49214|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 49214 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49214=edit proposed patch for the ICEs

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-14 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Yes, reverting 5d3ae76af13 cures this PR.