https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #25 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #24)
> On Thu, 20 May 2021, sripar01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
> >
> > --- Comment #23 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 May 2021, sripar01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #23 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #23 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> On Wed, 19 May 2021, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
> >
> > --- Comment #21 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 19 May 2021, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> Hi Srinath,
>
> when we add new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Hi Srinath,
when we add new assertions to gcc we use always a gcc_checking_assert
nowadays, that is also the case here.
The assertion is only firing in your compiler because it is a development
snapshot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #20 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17)
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
> >
> > --- Comment #16 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #19 from Alex Coplan ---
Ah, I missed that Srinath had already requested a backport here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/569318.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> (In reply to SRINATH
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to SRINATH PARVATHANENI from comment #15)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #14)
> > fixed on trunk.
>
> Thanks Bernd for fixing this on trunk, would you mind backporting this to
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #15 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #14)
> fixed on trunk.
Thanks Bernd for fixing this on trunk, would you mind backporting this to
GCC-10 as well?
Thanks you.
Regards,
Srinath.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bernd Edlinger :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23ac7a009ecfeec3eab79136abed8aac9768b458
commit r11-4668-g23ac7a009ecfeec3eab79136abed8aac9768b458
Author: Bernd Edlinger
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #11)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
> >
> > I failed to track down where we'd expand this to a possibly
> > unaligned mem - but is this just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from Bernd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #8 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
> (In reply to SRINATH PARVATHANENI from comment #4)
> > With the above patch I'm getting ICE as below while building arm-none-eabi
> > target:
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/emit-rtl.c
> > +++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.c
> > @@ -2089,7 +2089,8 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to SRINATH PARVATHANENI from comment #4)
> With the above patch I'm getting ICE as below while building arm-none-eabi
> target:
>
> checking for scalbnl... during RTL pass: expand
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #4 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> The expansion of assignments to misaligned ssa names
> does not handle the case of misaligned stores, which
> would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Thanks for reporting this.
The expansion of assignments to misaligned ssa names
does not handle the case of misaligned stores, which
would result in incorrect code without the assertion.
I have an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
25 matches
Mail list logo
