https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
andysem at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andysem at mail dot ru
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> I asked my colleagues within intel to revise the descriptions in the
> intrinsics guide to make it more explicit about NAN operands.
>
> I'll fix this issue after th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Guillaume Piolat from comment #5)
> My reasoning for reporting (while it is minor) is the following:
> - it might not be a conscious choice from GCC developers
> - this is the only intrinsics I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:240f0a490dae0fb9ef72fa21a93e8088d17fb682
commit r11-6605-g240f0a490dae0fb9ef72fa21a93e8088d17fb682
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jan 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #5 from Guillaume Piolat ---
My reasoning for reporting (while it is minor) is the following:
- it might not be a conscious choice from GCC developers
- this is the only intrinsics I've found in mmx/sse/sse2 for which GCC has
differen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
Also found some dead code in ix86_expand_sse_comi which is called by
if (fcode >= IX86_BUILTIN__BDESC_COMI_FIRST
&& fcode <= IX86_BUILTIN__BDESC_COMI_LAST)
where all builtins are defined with flags as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Guillaume Piolat from comment #0)
> Created attachment 49926 [details]
> Behaviour with 3 compilers
>
> _mm_comieq_sd has different NaN semantics for different people.
>
> # The Unordered team
>
