[Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] problematic build of uClibc with -fPIC

2021-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target|sparc

[Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] problematic build of uClibc with -fPIC

2021-01-26 Thread romain.naour at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784 --- Comment #10 from Romain Naour --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) > > OK, this makes sense now and this looks like a bootstrap problem, e.g. the > > code setting up _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ in the libc might be trying to access > >

[Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] problematic build of uClibc with -fPIC

2021-01-26 Thread romain.naour at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784 --- Comment #9 from Romain Naour --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7) > > The previous gcc command line was from the busybox build (without -fPIC) but > > this is not busybox that crash... this is the libc. > > > > See how the libc

[Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] problematic build of uClibc with -fPIC

2021-01-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > OK, this makes sense now and this looks like a bootstrap problem, e.g. the > code setting up _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ in the libc might be trying to access > it or something along this line. I misremembered:

[Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] problematic build of uClibc with -fPIC

2021-01-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10/11 Regression]