https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 11.3 and 10.5 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18eecb8c4a97716d4bc4890b05c91f172fadc7b3
commit r10-10928-g18eecb8c4a97716d4bc4890b05c91f172fadc7b3
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:293075002a7eaf1e9d457a1839bcaf83f8626824
commit r11-9301-g293075002a7eaf1e9d457a1839bcaf83f8626824
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80fe172ba9820199c2bbce5d0611ffca27823049
commit r12-5108-g80fe172ba9820199c2bbce5d0611ffca27823049
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think it's exactly those changes which have caused this FAIL. See PR
libstdc++/103133 (which I have a patch for, and which fixes this).
Is everybody seeing this FAIL using glibc 2.34?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes but the point of the test (and the change it is meant to be testing) is to
verify it works before those changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Jon -- you might want to sync with the glibc folks. IIUC they're rolled
libpthread into libc in glibc-2.34 which may make this is a non-issue going
forward, which I can certainly live with.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
PR 95989 is specifically about static linking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Bernd E. analyzed this in the thread referenced in c#1.
The test links staticly and we're pulling in the weak definition of
pthread_join.
I'm not sure why we're linking statically. Reverting to normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'd better disable it again until I have time to figure it out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I do see it failing on at least one powerpc64 LE machine. PR97944 said it used
to fail randomly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-24
15 matches
Mail list logo
