https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1503b9a3d2f480d3df42823cd47c3b6c12f5564
commit r12-6534-ge1503b9a3d2f480d3df42823cd47c3b6c12f5564
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > no longer xfailed. I suggest to re-add the { xfail *-*-* } to the
> > profitability check.
>
> You mean xfail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> no longer xfailed. I suggest to re-add the { xfail *-*-* } to the
> profitability check.
You mean xfail for non-x86 targets?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Well, it was
// This used to work on { target x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } but a fix in SLP
// discovery makes us trip over the threshold again.
// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "not vectorized:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
As said in the patch submission:
I have changed scan-tree-dump patterns in g++.dg/vect/slp-pr98855.cc
to check that no SLP vectorization was performed. The existing
scan-tree-dump-times was too fragile,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
