https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264
--- Comment #9 from Eric Feng ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
>
> If we move past the difference in semantics of the idioms in the patch, I
> still don't see why there actually was error for the original syntax. There
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
I don't think it's worthwhile to keep this open, as I'm pretty sure I fixed it
for all targets, as the cause wasn't target-related. Otherwise, reopen; if
adding a sarcastic comment, then preferably
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3dd69706af4c086cb3385ff1f321887b91f49fb
commit r14-3631-gd3dd69706af4c086cb3385ff1f321887b91f49fb
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|analyzer|testsuite
