[Bug testsuite/21707] [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: syntax error target selector

2005-05-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-23 08:46 --- Hi Guys, I have checked in a patch which restores Kazuhiro's original patch and which should stop the testsuite from complaining. Cheers Nick -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21707

[Bug testsuite/21707] [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: syntax error target selector

2005-05-23 Thread themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-05-23 09:13 --- I will regression test it, later on to confirm it is really fixed. If all goes well, I'll change the resolution to FIXED and status to RESOLVED. -- What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/21707] [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: syntax error target selector

2005-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23 12:44 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/21707] [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: syntax error target selector

2005-05-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-22 14:50 --- Confirmed, see the whole thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01937.html. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/21707] [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: syntax error target selector

2005-05-22 Thread themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-05-22 15:46 --- Testing patch (from thread http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01937.html) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21707

[Bug testsuite/21707] [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: syntax error target selector

2005-05-22 Thread themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-05-22 19:06 --- Kazuhiro Inaoka's patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01937.html) resolves this problem Test summary available at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg01442.html --