[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #15 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-13 16:37 --- Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 17:19 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-09 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-09 18:02 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 17:19 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-08 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #12 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-08 16:43 --- *** Bug 26406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 15:29 --- Any news on these three testsuite failures? It is getting annoying to have testsuite regressions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-06 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #9 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-06 15:35 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 15:29 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 17:10 --- (In reply to comment #9) As I've mentioned at least 3 times now, the Ada mis-compilations have priority. I'm working on these between fixing Ada issues. When there's status worth mentioning, I'll certainly add

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-06 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #11 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-06 17:21 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:10 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-03-05 Thread belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
--- Comment #7 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2006-03-05 15:27 --- seen also on amd64 with r111705 -- belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:22 --- They were introduced between 29 and 75. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:24 --- Maybe even between 72 and 75. Which means the following change cause this: 2006-02-16 Jeff Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] + * tree-vrp.c (set_value_range_to_nonnegative): New function. +

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:25 --- Shows up on ia64 also: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00886.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-17 18:35 --- Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:43 --- (In reply to comment #4) Just tar up the mess and pass them to me directly. I will once the testsuite has finished running. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-17 21:19 --- Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if

[Bug testsuite/26344] [4.2 Regression] three testsuite failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

2006-02-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last