--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 00:43 ---
Subject: Bug 33153
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Sep 13 00:43:04 2007
New Revision: 128454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128454
Log:
PR testsuite/33153
* gcc.dg/pr32912-1.c: Add
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 33153
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Sep 13 03:45:16 2007
New Revision: 128456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128456
Log:
PR testsuite/33153
* gcc.dg/pr32912-1.c: Add
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 03:49 ---
Fixed.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-26 23:20 ---
The patch proposed here fixes the failures on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
However, I'm still left with the failure of pr32912-2.c on hppa64-hp-hpux*.
The function foo is miscompiled:
.align 8
L$C:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-22 23:38 ---
The warning comes from:
typedef int __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
__m128i a, b, c, d, e, f;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33153
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-22
23:39 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr32912-[12].c (test for excess errors)
The warning comes from:
typedef int __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
__m128i a, b, c, d, e, f;
Right. Would it be ok
On 22 Aug 2007 23:39:50 -, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. Would it be ok to make this declaration static? That
will avoid the warning.
I think in this case, yes.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-22 23:42 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr32912-[12].c (test for excess errors)
On 22 Aug 2007 23:39:50 -, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. Would it be ok to make this declaration static?
