[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-27 15:50 --- Here is a newer result on Fedora 10: === gfortran tests === Running target unix === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes29107 # of expected failures 14 # of

[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-27 16:00 --- (In reply to comment #5) ! Test XFAILed on these platforms because the system's printf() lacks ! proper support for denormalized long doubles. See PR24685 Looks like this testcase should be xfailed on solaris also.

[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-27 16:18 --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) This is not so much an error in Fortran than it is an error in the scripting and it's ability to add it's own LD_LIBRARY_PATH components. No. The current linking

Re: [Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]?gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread DJ Delorie
I think adding a printf() clone to libiberty is WAY overkill just to silence one failing test.

[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread dj at redhat dot com
--- Comment #9 from dj at redhat dot com 2009-01-27 19:38 --- Subject: Re: [trunk regression]?gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously I think adding a printf() clone to libiberty is WAY overkill just to silence one failing test. --

[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #10 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-27 22:28 --- (In reply to comment #1) Note that some of the tests require specific features (such as denormalized long doubles) and are ... (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) This is not so much an error in Fortran

[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #11 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-27 22:45 --- (In reply to comment #9) Subject: Re: [trunk regression]?gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously I think adding a printf() clone to libiberty is WAY overkill just to silence

[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-27 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #12 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-27 23:26 --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #9) Two alternatives are: I guess there is three. 3. The gcc Testsuite is testing 'outside of gcc' and exercising the libraries of the Operating System (maybe GNU libc /

[Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]�gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously

2009-01-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 19:28 --- ! Test XFAILed on these platforms because the system's printf() lacks ! proper support for denormalized long doubles. See PR24685 Looks like this testcase should be xfailed on solaris also. -- pinskia at gcc