--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-01 10:20 ---
This is a dup of c++/42748, which has now been fixed.
So marking this pr as duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42748 ***
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:
What
--- Comment #13 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-03-01 00:23 ---
This is a dup of c++/42748, which has now been fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40459
--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-22
18:29 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I tried to build gcc on darwin to debug this but the build fails with a link
failure (sorry, don't remember exactly where). Do I need to do something
special to build on
--- Comment #10 from espindola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-17 18:09
---
I tried to build gcc on darwin to debug this but the build fails with a link
failure (sorry, don't remember exactly where). Do I need to do something
special to build on darwin?
The error message is emitted
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-17 19:16 ---
I tried to build gcc on darwin to debug this but the build fails with a link
failure (sorry, don't remember exactly where). Do I need to do something
special to build on darwin?
On which version of darwin did
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-16
13:58 ---
Any suggestions on how we can debug this issue further on darwin? Would this
bug indicate that we are missing some section of a previous patch addressing
mangling for the darwin target?
--
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-16 14:11 ---
It seems like you're getting the right warning message, just on a different
line than expected. I guess Rafael's checkin changed when the warning is
emitted on targets that support COMDAT groups, but not on other
--- Comment #7 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-16
14:32 ---
Shouldn't darwin have support for comdat? This patch, which went into FSF gcc
ages ago, suggests so...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-01/msg02186.html
--
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-16
20:29 ---
What's up with the instantiation portions of the warning messages in darwin? On
Fedora 10, gcc trunk shows...
~/dist/bin/g++ mangle11.C -nostdinc++ -fmessage-length=0 -Wabi -fabi-version=1
-S -o
--- Comment #9 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-16
22:19 ---
So I assume darwin is the only target that uses 'a poor man's comdat group'
rather than a real one? I don't see any other targets failing these tests.
--
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-15
01:56 ---
Any ideas on why we are failing this on x86_64-apple-darwin10? There we are
seeing...
Executing on host:
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc45-4.4.999-20091211/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-27
03:43 ---
The logical candidate for these failures is...
Author: espindola
Date: Mon Jun 15 14:25:50 2009
New Revision: 148492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148492
Log:
2009-06-15 Rafael
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-07-27
14:01 ---
Not having much luck regression testing this one. Revision 148492 and 148493
both fail to bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40459
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-07-20
03:08 ---
From the regress powerpc-apple-darwin9 tester, the last revision which doesn't
show these failures was r148485 and the first to show these failures was
r148498.
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
