[Bug testsuite/41612] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_2.f03

2009-10-10 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-10 17:34 --- Subject: Bug 41612 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Oct 10 17:34:06 2009 New Revision: 152624 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152624 Log: 2009-10-10 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/41612] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_2.f03

2009-10-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-10-10 18:08 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_2.f03 I am not sure that the change will allow the compilation if k0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41612

[Bug testsuite/41612] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_2.f03

2009-10-06 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 01:24 --- Subject: Bug 41612 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Oct 7 01:24:27 2009 New Revision: 152510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152510 Log: 2009-10-06 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/41612] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_2.f03

2009-10-06 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 01:26 --- Fixed on trunk. This test may still fail for platforms that have neither kind=10 or kind=16. Probably we should just XFAIL those if they show up. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: