--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 17:53 ---
Subject: Bug 44701
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 27 17:52:35 2010
New Revision: 162581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162581
Log:
PR testsuite/44701
* doc/md.texi: Clarify m and es
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 17:58 ---
Should be fixed now.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 12:06 ---
Fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44701
--- Comment #8 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-23 12:22 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Fixed?
No, the test case itself needs a fix too. Jakub posted it to gcc-patches, but
it was never approved AFAIK and is still not applied.
--
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 14:04 ---
Subject: Bug 44701
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 13 14:03:49 2010
New Revision: 162142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162142
Log:
PR testsuite/44701
* recog.c (constrain_operands):
--- Comment #4 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 21:03
---
Adding '' to the =m constraint fixes the testcase, but adding a single ''
(or '') results in an error for impossible constraints. This is caused by the
following snippet that was added to reload1.c:
--- Comment #5 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 21:05
---
Sorry, recog.c is where the prior code snippet came from.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44701
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-06 21:46 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-29 09:49 ---
Guess something like:
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/asm-es-2.c 2009-07-20 20:41:46.0
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/asm-es-2.c 2010-06-29 11:37:05.482959217
+0200
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ f2 (int
--- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-06-29 11:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
- asm (asm2%U0 %0 : =m (*p));
+ asm (asm2%U0 %0 : =m (*p));
That fixed the test case. Thanks. I didn't know about the PowerPC-specific %U
thing, but now I see that the compiler did
10 matches
Mail list logo
