[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2012-01-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-19 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #13 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-19 08:59:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Note that I have replaced all the occurrences of __restrict with __restrict__ I have found in gcc.dg/vect/* and bb-slp-25.c is the

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-18 08:52:56 UTC --- Thanks. Data dependence analysis can't determine dependence between src and dst although they have _restrict_, and it works fine on x86_64-suse-linux for example...

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-18 10:41:09 UTC --- Does darwin have a known problem with restrict? None I am aware of. BTW what is the difference between '*__restrict__' and '* __restrict' (or '*

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-18 10:45:08 UTC --- Note that the test succeeds if I replace '* __restrict' with '*__restrict__'

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #8 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-18 10:48:43 UTC --- Looks like there is a difference ;) I guess it succeeds with the patch to avoid loop vectorization and the fix of restrict together?

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-18 10:54:14 UTC --- Looks like there is a difference ;) I guess it succeeds with the patch to avoid loop vectorization and the fix of restrict together? Here is the

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #10 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-18 10:55:19 UTC --- Thanks, I'll commit it.

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread irar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-18 11:41:48 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Sep 18 11:41:43 2011 New Revision: 178942 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178942 Log: PR testsuite/50435 *

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-18 13:11:59 UTC --- Thanks, I'll commit it. Thanks for the quick fix. I'ld like to leave this pr open until someone figure out what's wrong with darwin and __restrict.

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-16 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-16 15:53:07 UTC --- I understand that the loop vectorization somehow worked, so could you please try the following patch to avoid it: Sorry, but after the patch I still

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-16 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-16 16:18:37 UTC --- Well, at least the loop is not vectorized now :). Could you please attach the slp dump (-fdump-tree-slp-details)? Thanks, Ira

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

2011-09-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-16 17:37:17 UTC --- Created attachment 25307 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25307 slp dump attached