https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-suse-linux|powerpc64-suse-linux,
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Bug #: 51693
Summary: New XPASSes in vectorizer testsuite on
powerpc64-suse-linux
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-28 12:27:18 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
be aligned even after peeling - that's why I added such check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #3 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com
2011-12-28 12:59:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26195
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26195
AVX2 vect dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #4 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com
2011-12-28 13:01:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
be aligned even after peeling - that's why
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-28 13:11:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
In vect-peel-3.c we actually assume that vector length is 16 byte. Here is the
loop body:
suma += ia[i];
sumb += ib[i+5];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #6 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com
2011-12-28 16:19:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
In vect-peel-3.c we actually assume that vector length is 16 byte. Here is
the
loop body:
suma +=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-29 07:37:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
Yes, vector_sizes_32B_16B seems to be ok in that case.
Other two tests (vect-multitypes-1.c and no-section-anchors-vect-69.c) look
like
11 matches
Mail list logo
