[Bug testsuite/61453] [4.10 Regression]: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 for targets where a call insn isn't "call"

2014-07-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61453 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/61453] [4.10 Regression]: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 for targets where a call insn isn't "call"

2014-07-09 Thread dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61453 --- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Jul 9 09:01:06 2014 New Revision: 212387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212387&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-07-09 Dominique d'Humieres PR testsuite/61453

[Bug testsuite/61453] [4.10 Regression]: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 for targets where a call insn isn't "call"

2014-06-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61453 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug testsuite/61453] [4.10 Regression]: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 for targets where a call insn isn't "call"

2014-06-09 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61453 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Could you please test the patch at > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02524.html? It works, thanks, my bad for not checking the mailing

[Bug testsuite/61453] [4.10 Regression]: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 for targets where a call insn isn't "call"

2014-06-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61453 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|