https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> On December 17, 2015 4:19:00 PM GMT+01:00, "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org"
> wrote:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 18 13:52:11 2015
New Revision: 231815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231815=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-12-18 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/68776
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yep. I'll verify the fix and commit today if all goes well. Thanks for the
investigation!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so vect_recog_mult_pattern detects IV address computations here. Not too
useful in this case, but hey. Does
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-u16.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #4)
> Yep. I'll verify the fix and commit today if all goes well. Thanks for the
> investigation!
Actually, looking at check_effective_target_vect_int_mult, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 17, 2015 4:19:00 PM GMT+01:00, "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776
>
>--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt