[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

2018-01-10 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

2018-01-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

2017-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- So remove the xfail from the test and keep some (non-regression?) PR where you track the rest?

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

2017-12-05 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

2017-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

2017-11-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |testsuite Target Milestone|---