[Bug testsuite/91449] [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails

2019-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug testsuite/91449] [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails

2019-08-14 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/91449] [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails

2019-08-14 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Aug 14 22:26:40 2019 New Revision: 274495 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274495=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/91449 - new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails on powerpc64

[Bug testsuite/91449] [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails

2019-08-14 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The difference in the memcpy folding (done in gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op) is due to i386 target (an a few others) defining the MOVE_MAX macro to 16 while powerpc64 (and many others to 8), and quite a few

[Bug testsuite/91449] [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails

2019-08-14 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|