[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:151bf47e78f5d919f6cc591d11cc1f6aff61078f commit r10-6957-g151bf47e78f5d919f6cc591d11cc1f6aff61078f Author: Segher Boessenkool Date:

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I didn't look at the history to see who marked it a P1. I did consider the possibility that this was being kept open because the test failures, while seemingly innocuous, were actually something much more

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- I don't think I marked this as P1, fwiw, I hardly ever prioritise bugs, and I would never make a test tweak a P1.

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- This and PR88233 were lost somewhere behind the sofa ;-)

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- commit 6cad71cf330623d4a01cb1bb77d4398b1674c776 Author: Segher Boessenkool Date: Wed Jul 10 21:58:08 2019 + fix pr68805.c diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g |powerpc64le-*-*

[Bug testsuite/91797] [10 regression] r273240 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr68805.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91797 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This also affects gcc.target/powerpc/pr87507.c FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr87507.c scan-assembler-times \\mstd\\M 4 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr87507.c scan-assembler-not \\mld\\M