[Bug testsuite/95008] [11 regression] excess errors in gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c and gcc.dg/two-types-6.c after r11-169

2020-05-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95008 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/95008] [11 regression] excess errors in gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c and gcc.dg/two-types-6.c after r11-169

2020-05-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95008 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8415ced06ed9690dfbce8b8b5f2f4f98f15598b6 commit r11-236-g8415ced06ed9690dfbce8b8b5f2f4f98f15598b6 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug testsuite/95008] [11 regression] excess errors in gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c and gcc.dg/two-types-6.c after r11-169

2020-05-08 Thread manfred99 at gmx dot ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95008 --- Comment #2 from Manfred Schwarb --- gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c: Sorry, I can't reproduce, this test passes for me. gcc.dg/two-types-6.c: My bad, I forgot to mention this failure, as this test did not make sense to me. I could not determine

[Bug testsuite/95008] [11 regression] excess errors in gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c and gcc.dg/two-types-6.c after r11-169

2020-05-08 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95008 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug testsuite/95008] [11 regression] excess errors in gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c and gcc.dg/two-types-6.c after r11-169

2020-05-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95008 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com Last