https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98225

            Bug ID: 98225
           Summary: gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: testsuite
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Between 20201020 (5d53ec27015b916640171e891870adf2c6fdfd4c) and 20201021
(c8f795cac6a1325bc6bcba3f47b7d04cb790400c),
a couple of gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp tests began to FAIL:

FAIL: outputs lto st mult dumpdir named: dir/outputs-ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st mult empty dumpbase namedb:
dir/outputs.ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st mult empty dumpbase unnamed: a.ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st mult namedb: dir/outputs.ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st mult unnamed: a.ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st sing dumpdir empty dumpbase named:
dir/outputs-0.ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st sing dumpdir named: dir/outputs-ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st sing empty dumpbase namedb:
dir/outputs.ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st sing empty dumpbase unnamed: a.ltrans0.ltrans_args
FAIL: outputs lto st sing namedb: dir/outputs.ltrans0.ltrans

I'm seeing this on both Solaris/sparc and x86, 32 and 64-bit, both with the
native
linker and with GNU ld (thus without and with the lto-plugin).  There are also
gcc-testresults reports for all sorts of targets: i686-pc-linux-gnu,
aarch64-suse-linux-gnu, riscv64-suse-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.4, x86_64-apple-darwin16.

I've tried to have a look, but failed for all sorts of reasons:

* When running the corresponding compilation with -v, -v isn't passed on to
  lto-wrapper.
* Despite -save-temps, the lto-wrapper input objects are removed at the end,
  so I cannot manually rerun lto-wrapper to investigate.

I guess this would be way easier for someone familiar with the code to
investigate.

Reply via email to