https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4db34072d5336d13b66f7185ec6454aa7d36f3c7
commit r12-1275-g4db34072d5336d13b66f7185ec6454aa7d36f3c7
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin ---
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 50896
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50896=edit
M1 M2 SPEC2017 P9 eval result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 50895
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50895=edit
Method 2, let pre generate loop carried dependence for very cheap and cheap
cost model.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 50894
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50894=edit
Method 1, implicitly enable pcom without unrolling once loop vectorization is
enabled but pcom isn't set explicitly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
>
> --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
>
> --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Thanks for the comments!
> There's predictive commoning which can do similar transforms and runs after
> vectorization. It might be it doesn't handle these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
There's predictive commoning which can do similar transforms and runs after
vectorization. It might be it doesn't handle these "simple" cases or that
loop dependence info is not up to the task there.
12 matches
Mail list logo